However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

around 16:30 on January 4, 2013, at the Home Packer shop located on the 117-8 underground floor of Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong 117-8, the Defendants conspired to get out of the above store staff by taking advantage of the gapss of staff members of the store, and Defendant A offered to get out of the said store. Defendant A, at the first grade of the Korea Livestock Packer's 30,320 won in the market price, at the first grade of 45,160 won in the market price, at the first grade of 1,77,760 won in the market price, and first grade of 52,270 won in the market price, and then moved this into the plastic Packer's brand, and then concealed it into the plastic Packer's bags. Defendant B was at the higher level than 415,50 won in the market price, 200 won in the above store Cacker's market price, 30,50150 won in the market price of 2.

As a result, the Defendants, together, stolen 392,390 won in the market price owned by the victim’s home plug.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Jan. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Re-assessment of reasons for discretionary mitigation);