2. The Defendants’ determination of the grounds for appeal in both cases recognized each of the instant crimes and reflects the depth thereof, and agreed with the victimJ in the case of Defendant A, and on November 21, 2014, the Busan District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment due to fraud, etc. on January 16, 2015, which became final and conclusive on January 16, 2015, and thus, should take into account the equity between the case to be tried concurrently with the said crime, etc. favorable to the Defendants.

However, the defendants had the records of punishment for the same crime, the frequency of each of the crimes of this case and the victims who suffered from them are planned to commit each of the crimes, and therefore the quality of the crimes is poor. The total amount of damage from each of the crimes of this case is a large amount of amount of KRW 554 million in the case of the defendant A, KRW 260 million in the case of the defendant Eul, and KRW 260 million in the case of the defendant Eul, and no recovery of damage was actually achieved. In addition, the victim L, AF for each of the crimes of this case, the victim W W, AT, AU, AU, AK, and AV wanted the defendants for each punishment against the defendant Eul, and there is no change of circumstances that can be considered in sentencing from the decision of the court below to the trial of the court below, and there is no other reason to view that the defendant's age, character, family environment, background of the crime, degree of participation in the crime, etc., and the sentencing guidelines and the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court are too heavy.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.