2. The court below's erroneous determination that the defendant recognized the defendant's wrong and reflects the fact that the amount of unjust enrichment actually acquired is not significant. However, the above argument by the defendant is without merit since it is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances that there is a need to strictly punish a serious social harm, such as infringing the consumer's right food choice and trust, and impairing the sound distribution order of agricultural products, etc., such as the crime of this case. In addition, in light of the circumstances of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.