However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 22, 2011, the Defendant issued, respectively, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million at the Seoul Western District Court, which was issued by the same court on July 16, 201, a fine of KRW 3.5 million for the same offense, and a fine of KRW 5 million at the Incheon Western District Court on October 25 of the same year.

Although the Defendant had been subject to punishment twice or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as above, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.060% on October 18, 2014, and was driving B CorodoC car at the section of approximately 500 meters around the Dongyang-ro 939 Sinyang-ro 1, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, with the influence of alcohol level of 0.060% on October 18, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report accompanied by summary orders of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the following: (a) the Defendant was under drinking alcohol driving 4 times in a short term; and (b) the occurrence of traffic accidents in the course of driving alcohol under the instant case; (c) however, the Defendant recognized and reflects the crime; (d) there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and (e) there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime shall be