청구이의
1. The Defendant’s loans extended to the Plaintiff on January 18, 2018 (main office) by the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court).
According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4 (including additional numbers), the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff for loans with the Seoul Central District Court 2015Da5375759 and was sentenced to a full winning judgment on April 12, 2016. The plaintiff appealed from the appellate court [Seoul Central District Court 2016Na202485, 2017Na20690 (Counterclaim), 2017Na2080)] to the plaintiff, "the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) of this case. The defendant of this case is the defendant of this case. The defendant of this case: 32,580,000 won and its related amount were 5% per annum from January 30, 2016 to January 18, 2018; 36% per annum 185, 2018, and 15% per annum 2884, 2016, respectively, and 36% per annum 2816.85.
According to the above facts of recognition, since the obligation of the plaintiff against the defendant has ceased to exist due to the plaintiff's repayment, compulsory execution based on the above judgment against the defendant should be denied.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.