beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.30 2016고합646

뇌물공여

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on August 21, 2015 by the Seoul High Court on August 13, 2015 due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Epis) at the tax accounting corporation T in Seocho-gu Seoul, the representative director of the tax accounting corporation T in the Seocho-gu Seoul S Building, and the above judgment was finalized on August 21, 20

Defendant

B was transferred from the Ministry of Health and Welfare to the National Tax Service on May 1, 1995, and served in U tax offices, V tax offices, etc., and was promoted from February 2, 2012 to December 2014, 2012, and served as the head of the Seoul Local Tax Service’s corporate tax office from January 2, 2015 to February 17, 2015, and retired from the office; while serving as the officer in the Seoul Local Tax ServiceY office from July 12, 2013 to September 29, 2013, the tax official performing the duties of the head of the “tax investigation team for verifying the sources of Z” was a tax official who performs the duties of the head of the “tax investigation team for the sources of Z” from around July 12, 2013 to September 29, 2013.

Defendant

C From February 2, 1986 to June 2012, the National Tax Service’s office from February 2, 2011 to June 2012, a person who served in the Seoul Local Tax Service AB from July 2012 to March 2015 and served as the head of AC’s operational support division from March 2015.

1. On August 21, 2013, Defendant A was appointed as a tax agent with respect to the tax investigation from Z, and around 19:00 on August 21, 2013, Defendant A provided cash of KRW 2,00,000 in cash, along with a solicitation from the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “AE” to the effect that he would request B to properly process the said tax investigation with respect to Z. On the same day as the meal expenses in the above AE, Defendant A provided entertainment in the amount by settling the liquor payment, etc. in the “AG” of the entertainment shop located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at night.

On September 11, 2013, the Defendant continued to provide entertainment by settling cash of KRW 3,00,000 for meals in AE, and the amount of liquor payments in AG, along with a solicitation from AE to the effect that the above tax investigation should be completed well.