2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 9, 2007, the Plaintiff requested on December 22:50, 2007, Jung-gu, Seoul, Chungcheongnam-gu, 1, to disclose “the CCTV content of the Babs from December 23, 2007 to December 10, 2007,” which was provided to the head of Seoul Southern-gu police station with the CCTV data stored on December 23, 2007, after obtaining D’s consent from 52 new world department stores, and the Plaintiff’s criminal cases related to the obstruction of performance of official duties against the police officers of the Babs, who were in charge of the Gabs, and the case where the Plaintiff complained of Dobs due to reading or abandonment of duties. The Plaintiff stored the CCTV data from 20:0 on December 23, 2007 to 10:30 on December 23, 2007, which was found to have been removed from 201.

(d) On December 15, 2008, at the request of the Seoul Central Police Agency, the head of the Seoul Southern Police Agency sent one CD in the same content and form as the Plaintiff provided, and subsequently requested the Seoul National Research and Investigation Agency to appraise the authenticity of CCTV recording records, and thereafter, requested that the data recorded with the CCTV system at the time of sampling from the National Research and Investigation Agency need to be stored in CCTV. < Amended by Act No. 9273, Dec. 23, 2008; Act No. 9374, Jan. 2, 2009; Act No. 9300, Jan. 3, 2009; Act No. 23:00 to 23:59, Jan. 3, 2009; Act No. 9527, Dec. 28, 2009; Act No. 9527, Jan. 28, 2009>