2. Determination is based on the facts that the defendant's wrong recognition of his/her behavior and living conditions are not good, and the criminal facts charged against him/her are found to have short of the period of arranging commercial sex acts, but the court below seems to have sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million reduced to a fine of KRW 10 million under a summary order, considering the above favorable circumstances for the defendant, and the defendant was found to have engaged in arranging commercial sex acts on August 29, 2013 and was investigated by an investigative agency on September 4, 2013, and submitted a sales contract as of September 2, 2013 with the content that he/she was disposing of the instant commercial sex acts. However, the court below did not err by misapprehending the following circumstances: (a) the defendant's act of arranging commercial sex acts again at the same place on September 26, 2013; and (b) the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case; and (c) the defendant's motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case; (d) the records.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.