No person of "2018 Highest 163" shall take in or inhale Toluene, which is a chemical that causes entertainment, halluation, or anesthesia.

Nevertheless, around 21:55 on January 12, 2018, the Defendant, at the cafeteria Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue Blue, injectedd the plastic bag into a plastic plastic bag, and inhaled the clue Blue Blu

On July 28, 2017, the Defendant damaged the victim X-owned X, which was stopped in front of the E apartment door W convenience store in Silung-si on July 28, 2017, by using the back door and fences of the driver's seat of the vehicle and damaged the repair cost of approximately KRW 60 cm and KRW 650,000,00.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 163" case

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The written statement of the Z;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation (a photographic image of the suspect's body inhaled);

1. Ratifications;

1. On-site photographs "2018 Godan 552" case;

1. Legal statement of the witness X;

1. Photographs of damaged goods;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the victim X-ray image-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 22 (1) (the inhaled points of hallucinogenic substances) of the Chemicals Control Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment”), although the Defendant and the defense counsel claimed that there was no fact that the said vehicle was damaged.

When the defendant passes on the side of the vehicle from the investigative agency to this court, the victim X clearly expressed the sound that the side of the vehicle is flick.

The following are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court: