When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 05:10 on June 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) filed a 112 report with the male having frightened a drinking fright; and (b) requested the Defendant to return home to the police who had been faced with a disturbance before the friendship of the female living together with the police box affiliated with the police box affiliated with the Maponam Police Station C commander of the Maponam Police Station: (c) stated that “Choe, fright, fright. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f., who

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of E and D;

1. One copy of a photograph of suspect, one copy of a police box, and one copy of a report processing case, one copy of a service log of the police box;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons for the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the degree and circumstances leading up to the obstruction of performance of official duties, the power of punishment, and reflectability.