보험에관한 소송
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
The plaintiff and the defendant concluded the claim.
1. The reasons why the court should explain concerning this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows: “Sag-gu or sag-gu” in the second page 20 to 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the fourth page 4 of the judgment.
Of the table in paragraph (5) [Attachment 20,000] in the table of claim, the term “20,000” shall be read as “30,000”, the term “220,000” in the total number of 9 cases of entering into a concentrated contract shall be read as “230,00”, the term “net Customs Duty” in the 5th sentence shall be read as “net Customs Duty Office”, and the term “the result of an application by this court for an order to submit documents to the National Pension Corporation” in the 5th sentence [based on recognition] shall be deleted, and instead, the term “the result of an inquiry by the National Pension Corporation's net Branch Office” in the 6th sentence shall be deleted, the term “10,000” shall be deleted, and the term “total 10,000” in the 7th sentence shall be cited as “one disease”, as it is in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.