beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.23 2017나50170

구상금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the use of the small portion between 5 and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance as Defendant A, “Defendant B,” and “Defendant B,” “B,” and the part between 5 and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Supplementary part] Defendant asserts that “The amount of the Plaintiff’s indemnity should be calculated in consideration of the negligence above, since the Plaintiff’s claim in this case is a large bus used by the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the church, and the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the road side without parking the Plaintiff’s vehicle at night without using the Plaintiff’s vehicle and its width, etc. on the parking lot located in the church, and it can be known that the accident may occur by the Plaintiff’s vehicle.”

The judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.