A. On August 9, 2014, the Plaintiff is driving while drinking alcohol around 00:30 on August 9, 2014 (hereinafter “instant drinking”).

A) A while stopping a vehicle on the road in front of C in the crossing-gun B, the driver was set at the driver’s seat, and the witness D reported 119, and the fire officer was called out. 2) A fire officer reported to the police for the opening of the vehicle at the site, and the police officer reported to the police for the purpose of opening the vehicle at the site, “I am head at the driver’s seat and there is no movement; hereinafter the same shall apply)” and the police officer F and G sent to the site.

3) When the above police officers arrive at the scene, the above fire officers had already moved the vehicle to a safe place, opened the door through the windows opened by the plaintiff, and moved the plaintiff to a early chief, and the plaintiff was taken to move to the early chief. The fire officers turned out the vehicle. 4) The above police officers transferred the case to the plaintiff, deeming that there is no particular error with the plaintiff as the police officers arrive, and left the scene.

5) The police officers deemed the Plaintiff to have driven under the influence of alcohol and demanded the Plaintiff to stop, but the Plaintiff did not comply with the request, and the police officers called the Plaintiff that “I would satisfe” without complying therewith. 6) The police officers were unable to wear the Plaintiff’s satfe on the hand, and the police officers failed to take the satfe on the hand of the Plaintiff when the time was delayed. As the Plaintiff satfebly against the Plaintiff, the police officers got off the car without being

7) The Plaintiff: (a) moved 5 to 10 minutes on one hand while getting on the patrol car and arrived at the E District; (b) police officers went around about 30 hours in the course of preparing for the Plaintiff’s investigation; (c) police officers released the Plaintiff’s lock before signing and affixing a signature on a voluntary behavior letter; and (d) the Plaintiff responded to the Plaintiff’s request for a breathic measurement through the respiratory body on two occasions; (c) the Plaintiff raised objection to the result of the measurement; and (d) requested the collection of blood to the nearby hospital.