A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a adult computer and telephone room in the name of "D" on the second floor of the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, from June 2016, and Defendant B is an employee of the above adult computer and telephone room.

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime at the aforesaid “D” adult computer and telephone room from June 2016 to September 8, 2016, installed in the said store the PC for servers in which the face value of gender is recorded with an obscene video file in which 2,794 was stored, and made it accessible through the 10 PC connected to the internal communication network to many and unspecified persons visiting the said place, who received KRW 6,00 per hour and received KRW 6,000.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to distribute or openly display obscene images through the information and communications network.

2. No person who has installed computers, television, video viewing equipment, singing room, etc. in a school environment sanitation and cleanup zone by dividing them into a smuggling, sealed space, or partitions, etc., or equipped with similar facilities, shall intermediate voice conversations between unspecified persons, with business or telecommunications equipment in which mainly adult media, such as adult video works, game products, and speculative game products, are likely to be distributed, and with such equipment and facilities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the above adult computer and telephone room in the above "D" adult computer and telephone room located in a school environment cleanup zone located within a distance of 200 meters from the boundary of the "E elementary school" as stated in paragraph 1. The Defendant operated the above adult computer and telephone room by installing the same method as described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A written statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Report on internal accidents (Analysis of hard disks);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Results of the geographical information system search;