The sentence of the court below is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

(In particular, the amount of fine and surcharge determined by the court below is too excessive). The court below determined the sentence against the defendant in consideration of the circumstances incurred for the sentencing in its ruling, and it is reasonable to respect the judgment of the court below in this case where no particular change in circumstances is found in the sentencing conditions.

In addition, considering the various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, and motive and circumstance of the crime, it does not seem that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it goes beyond the scope of discretion.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

[Defendant's assertion that the amount of additional collection charges is excessive, but there is the purpose of the additional collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic in order to eradicate the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Do7194, Aug. 20, 2014). Accordingly, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the fact that the defendant gains 7.8 million won due to the act of arranging sexual traffic as stated in the court below's holding that the amount of additional collection charges calculated by the court below is appropriate (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 470, Mar. 3, 201).