beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.09.04 2014고단710

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 26, 2014, around 04:15, the Defendant: (a) went back to five stories of the victim E (the age of 58) who is the manager of the Gosiwon, even though he was 4th floor of the Gosi-gu Building, Seogu-gu, Daegu.

The defendant, as a step before the above victim's house, avoided the disturbance of the elevator by launching it, and the victim took the face of the victim by opening the door and drinking the door in order to confirm it.

The victim got away from the door by passing through the entrance, and entered the place to drive the victim.

The defendant found the victim who wanted to avoid violence in the plan, and caused damage to the sphere that requires treatment for about 21 days by walking the victim's head, drinking the body of the victim, walking the side sphere part of the victim's body by drinking, and walking the victim's side sphere.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence and injured the victim.

2. At the time and place of Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant respondeded to the question of whether he/she has committed an assault, “a person who has committed an assault to the district because he/she committed an assault,” and “a person who has committed an assault to the district” from the slope H belonging to the Seongbuk Police Station G District G District, which was called upon by the above wife F.

Accordingly, the Defendant, along with the above police officers, took a bath to the above police officers, who were on board the back seat of the police vehicle and moved to the G Area, and used the above police officers to “singing, singing away, sing away, and sing away,” and assaulted the above police officers at once on the side flag of the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of H, F, and E;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime.