If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant did not have filed an application for the opening of the cell phone with the victim B;

A. A. On October 24, 2012, around 2012, when he/she applied for F mobile phone membership in the name of Busan, the name of the bank, the name of the bank, the name of the bank, the account holder, the account number, the account number, and the resident registration number of the account holder, stated the F mobile phone membership application in the name of the non-cheon-si, Nowon-si, the name of the bank.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged one copy of a new service contract, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. At the same time and place of uttering of the forgery of private document, a forged customer application form was issued to the J located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I as if it were duly formed and used.

C. On October 24, 2012, at the J’s request on October 24, 2012, when the automatic transfer was made by opening a Handphone through the Handphone, the 44,060 won of the use fee for the relevant mobile phone was withdrawn from the sk telecom from the new bank account owned by the victim B to the sk telecom, thereby causing property damage to the relevant party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;