beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.25 2014고단9302

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Defendant 6,100,000 won and C respectively to the applicant for compensation, and 7,00,000 won and 7,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 9302]

1. On May 22, 2014, the Defendant called the victim D and made a false statement to the effect that “Around May 22, 2014, the Defendant sold 14 million won and added 1,580,000 won to 1,40,000 won for 14 million won for 10,000 won for 10 million won for 10,000 won for 1,4 million won for 1,580,000 won for 2.”

However, the fact was that the Defendant was economically difficult at the time, and the ongoing household business did not make any profit, so even if he purchased the bank and sold it to a third party, the Defendant did not have the intent and ability to reduce the purchase price and profit.

The Defendant received KRW 20,500,000 from the victim under the name of one bank account in the name of F on the same day.

2. On May 26, 2014, at around 10:30 on May 26, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “if one further purchase is made, it shall be sold in the amount of KRW 15.6 million and KRW 19.5 million in the amount of KRW 1,9.5 million in the amount of KRW 1,5.9 million in the amount of KRW 3.9 million in the amount of profit, i.e., 3., 15.6 million in the amount of profit, and 3.9 million in the amount of profit, may be fully paid in the amount of money, and if sending money, it may be given in the amount of money.

However, the fact was that the Defendant was economically difficult at the time, and the ongoing household business did not make any profit, so even if he purchased the bank and sold it to a third party, the Defendant did not have the intent and ability to reduce the purchase price and profit.

The Defendant received KRW 16,100,000 from the victim under the name of one bank account (G) in the name of one bank account in the same day.

[2014 Highest 9931]

1. The criminal defendant against the victim B, on June 25, 2014, remitted the price of goods to the victim B, who reported the Internet’s writing of sales of the Internet’s prestigious items.