A. The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) imposed on the Defendant by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the records and arguments of this case, there is no change of circumstances that could consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and the crime of this case is easy to commit a considerable social harm, and the responsibility for the crime is grave, and the number of means of access kept by the defendant is large, etc., taking into account the circumstances asserted by the defendant and the prosecutor as the grounds for appeal, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the defendant and the prosecutor as the grounds for appeal, the sentence of the court below is too heavy or it cannot be deemed unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.