When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a joint representative C in Sacheon-si, who operates a manufacturing industry (V) using four full-time workers.

An employer shall not do violence to a worker for the occurrence of accidents or for any other reason.

Nevertheless, the Defendant worked from June 30, 2019 to September 30, 2019 at the same place of business and retired victim D (D, nationality: Vietnam) at around September 20, 2019, the Defendant completed the victim’s head with Daa and Daa, “Woo, Hask, Hask......................” After 1 minute after 1 minute after 2019, the Defendant called “the victim’s head............, after 200, the Defendant made the victim’s head at the same place of business one time.” The Defendant again called “the victim’s head......”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police investigator against D;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. Family relation certificate:

1. Application of employment contract Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 107 and Article 8 of the Labor Standards Act and Articles 107 and 8 of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not easy in light of the following: (a) the Defendant and the victim’s relationship; (b) the Defendant did not agree with the victim; and (c) the Defendant did not make any effort to recover damage; and (d) the Defendant’s liability is not easy in light of the following: (a) the Defendant and the victim’s relationship; and (b) the details and circumstances of the crime; and (b) the Defendant did not

However, the defendant recognizes all the facts charged of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and is identical to the defendant.