The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with B urban bus (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant bus”) with C (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant truck”) with respect to the Plaintiff’s car free shop (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s car”).

B. On July 27, 2014, around 15:00, at the time of the instant traffic accident, the traffic accident (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) which conflicts with the Defendant’s truck, which is driven by the central line on the opposite lane in the direction of safety while Defendant bus was driven by the central line in the direction of transmission in the direction of the central line. At the time of the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff’s automobile was parked across the delivery and road located on the right side of Defendant bus, and then the Defendant bus conflicts with the Defendant’s automobile and re-confited with the Plaintiff’s automobile.

C. The instant traffic accident led to the death of F, which is the Defendant truck driver, and the injury of G, Defendant bus passengers H, and I, which are the Defendant bus driver.

The Defendant filed a petition with the Plaintiff for deliberation on the damage incurred in relation to the instant traffic accident, and determined that the committee for deliberation on the indemnity payment was the cause of the instant traffic accident and the negligence ratio of the Plaintiff’s car was 15%.

E. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff pay KRW 16,851,870, which is 15% of the total insurance money that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff as a reimbursement. On July 22, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 16,851,870 to the Defendant.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The instant traffic accident is the Defendant.