게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.
1. Defendant B is a person who operates “G amusement room” on the F and the second floor of the Daegu-gu Month, and Defendant A is the president and the employee of the G amusement room, Defendant C is the managing director of the G amusement room, Defendant C is the employee of the G entertainment room, and Defendant D is the employee of the G entertainment room.
No one shall distribute, use, or provide game products the contents of which are different from those of the game products rated.
From February 14, 2012 to March 29, 2012, the Defendants: (a) captured more than 35 m35 m35 m of water in the G Entertainment room; (b) from around February 14, 2012 to around March 29, 2012, the number obtained by users of water at one straw; and (c) even if the number obtained by users as a game product in which the item appears, the Defendants installed 55 m of “H game machine” with the content that the discharge item does not appear, and provided it to unspecified multiple customers who found the said game site.
Defendant
B purchased a game machine by investing funds in the above game room and manage the game room in general, Defendant A was responsible for the role of the president when he regulates the game room as the nominal owner of the game room, Defendant C managed the above game room, and Defendant D operated the above game room in a way that the employee of the game room operates the game room in a manner that the customer is frightly.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to distribute, use or provide game products different from the game products rated.
2. The Defendants asserted that Defendant B purchased game products from Jind Game Game Business Operators, but only written the establishment of I as it was, and that the Defendants were unaware of the content of the game product different from that of the rated game product. The Defendants denied the charges.
The witness I's statement in the fourth trial record, the witness J's legal statement and the inquiry inquiry of K's fact-finding by the game developer.
In light of these circumstances, the Game Rating Board's Chairperson's reply to fact-finding made on June 12, 2013, and game description.