However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving C 4.5 tons of a superscopy truck.

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant driven the above truck at around 10:50 minutes and continued to run the road near the parking lot of the Museum, instead of the windows in the Si/Eup/Myeon, and instead of the windows in the Eup/Myeon.

Although the Defendant discovered in advance the victim D (n, 70 years of age) who walked on the road without delivery at the time, he did not take all measures such as reducing the speed and keeping a street, and caused the Defendant to shock the victim by the negligence of driving the above truck as it is.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cutting the body body of the body of the upper body, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above. After stopping the above truck, the Defendant confirmed the damage of the victim who was unloaded from the above truck, but did not take any measures, and escaped to the above truck again without taking any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;