When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 20, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness in a lawsuit claiming interest against the Defendant, and taken an oath by the Plaintiff B, the above court No. 2013Gau1820, in the court of Sung-gun, the Seo-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung-gun, the Sung

The Defendant testified as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s attorney D-D, the Plaintiff’s agent of the instant case, ① “The Defendant borrowed KRW 260 million, including the above KRW 250 million and the additional KRW 10 million, from the Plaintiff; and (b) the Defendant testified as “I am pressure on the job,” and ② “I am well aware of the fact that the Plaintiff borrowed from the bank and borrowed it to the Defendant at the time of borrowing the above money, the Defendant would have been well aware of the Defendant’s lending it from the bank,” and ③ “I see,” “I see,” and “I see,” “I am to the question that the Plaintiff would have agreed to be paid to the Plaintiff by the Defendant to the Plaintiff,” and “I am asked to the question that the Bank would have been responsible for the interest of the Plaintiff.”

However, the facts are not that Defendant C borrowed KRW 260 million to Plaintiff E, but that Defendant A prepared and borrowed a notarial deed on February 9, 2012 and KRW 260 million.

Therefore, although the Defendant borrowed KRW 260 million from B, the Defendant testified false testimony against his memory as he borrowed money and paid interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police of the F;

1. A written statement;

1. A complaint;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness;

1. Notarial deeds (No. 170), an investment contract;

1. Court rulings of the competent military court;

1. Prosecutions with regard to G.