2. In full view of the circumstances that the Defendant appeared to be against the Defendant when committing the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant did not have any criminal record going beyond the same criminal record or fine, etc. that the Defendant had any advantage to the Defendant, or that the Defendant did not have any criminal record beyond the same criminal record or fine, etc., and that the Defendant did not agree with the above employee, the lower court appears to reflect all the favorable circumstances, and that there is no change in circumstances that would have different punishment from the above, and that there is no other change in circumstances that would have different punishment from the Defendant’s age, character, character and environment, occupation, occupation, power, process of the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.