When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 15, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the National Bank located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant, at around 16:54 on August 15, 2014, and was sent to the police box B of the Suwon-si Police Station, who was so drunk that he was under the influence of alcohol, and was so drunk with C by the police box of the Suwon-si Police Station B.

The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, her bitch, bitched or bitched of the bitch bitch, or bitched of the police, her walk walk, and her walk walk walk, and her walk walked at one time

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

2. No person who violates the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (referring to the revocation or disturbance by a government office) shall alcoholic beverages by speech or behavior that has been drunk by a government office;

On August 15, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the grounds of Paragraph 1, around 17:15, and came to arrive at the Suwon-gu D Police Station B, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, said that “Chos, Dhos, Lhos, Lhos, Lhos, Lhos, Shos, Lhos, Shos, Lhos, Shos.

Accordingly, the defendant had been compelled by words and actions conducted by the B police box which is a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (No. 4 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing official duties), and the choice of fines (the fact that the defendant committed the crime in this case while under the influence of alcohol, committed the crime in this case, committed the crime in this case, was divided, and has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime).

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;