However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around July 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obtained a letter of performance of the contract under the name of the complainant (Defendant) at the Gowon-gun, Gowon-gun, Gowon-gun; (b) submitted a letter of complaint to the person in charge of the investigation and the office of the intelligence police station on the 19th day of the same month; and (c) made a forgery or alteration of the above letter of complaint to the complainant (Defendant) by arbitrarily stating at will the bottom of the right; and (d) made a civil lawsuit against the complainant (Defendant) by forging the above document; (c) sent the forged or altered document to the Young-gun court; and (d) submitted it to the person in charge of the investigation and the office of the intelligence on the 19th day of the same month; and (e) made a supplementary statement to the same effect.

However, around September 24, 2014, the Defendant first entrusted the Defendant’s housing construction work to D, and waived part of D with the left construction, and the remainder of D had C undergo E. However, the Defendant: (a) five persons, including the Defendant, C, D, E, and creditors F, who were related to D and E, without paying the additional construction cost incurred by C; and (b) five persons, including the Defendant, C, D, E, and creditors F, who were related to D and E, were gathered into D’s house located in the former Go Chang-gun, Go Chang-gun, North Korea on August 16, 2015; and (c) five persons, as seen earlier, agreed upon the final agreement that D and E were to be completed; (c) five persons, who were drafted between the Defendant and the former Defendant.

On July 23, 2015, at the bottom of the left-hand side, the phrase “H located Corporation shall delegate to I (C)” was additionally stated on July 23, 2015, and the Defendant also consented to the entry of the additional contents as agreed at that site.

After that, C, even though it requested the defendant to change the construction cost of 10,735,50 won, the defendant continued to refuse it.