beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.11.07 2018고단53

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was working as team members at the credit management team of the NAC located in Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun in 2013.

At the time, the Defendant was involved in the process of receiving loans of approximately KRW 3 billion from the above AF while building friendly E’s lending in the old city F, and the Defendant, who was involved in the loan, did not repay the loan, was liable for the bad loans to the Defendant.

On March 2013, the Defendant drafted a false letter of payment undertaking in the name of the president of the NAFFFFF and let G know of this fact borrow money from the victim H by using the letter of payment undertaking, and was willing to resolve the issue of loans to E, the money.

1. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant of a private document forgery: (a) under the title “Written undertaking of Payment” by means of a computer from the said AFFF, the Defendant promised to pay the said price to the Plaintiff at KRW 30,00,00,000; and (b) to pay the said price to the IFFF at KRW 10,00,000; and (c) to pay the said price to the Nonghyup.

", 014.10 ", 013.10", "the representative of D Agricultural Cooperatives, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, J (person)" were printed, and the seal impression of the head of DF association was stamped next to the name of J.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of commitment to payment under the name of J, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On the same day as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant’s exercise of the above investigation document and the fraud will provide the Victim H with a loan of KRW 2.7 million to the G by taking out loan from the G as security to the G, i.e., loan of KRW 2.7 million in the Gu-U.S. K, and will also offer the payment undertaking in the name of the president of the NAF in the name of the NAF.

“In doing so, the victim, who was aware of the forgery, did not know of the forgery as if he had duly formed a forged letter of payment undertaking like the preceding paragraph.

In this respect.