In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

On October 12, 2018, at around 01:20, the Defendants appeared in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and assaulted, such as: (a) the police officer E and assistant F, who was in the patrol duty, to witness the catf and to arrest G and H in the act of violence with one another; (b) the Defendants “I see why I want to fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Investigation report (victim’s hearing report on the F statement);

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders (H and G);

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (the fact that the defendants both recognize the crimes of this case and reflects the wrongness, the defendant A has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the previous fine, and the defendant B has no record of criminal punishment, etc.)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;