1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant guilty of the facts charged (excluding the portion not guilty) on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just that the court below ordered the defendant and the respondent for an attachment order to attach an electronic tracking device for five years on the ground that the risk of recidivism exists, and there is no error of law as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.