A. On April 29, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the Defendant with respect to the construction work contracted by the Defendant from the Net City, the place of the order, as follows:

1. Construction name: A net thousand housing site development project;

2. The name of goods: Provision (a) of facilities for landscaping and relaxation in the housing site development project in the Ocheon Housing Site Development Project, etc. (a studal, long-wavea, long-waveaB, circular high-frequency in its original form, Korean-style high-shotra, temporary shelters, and private shelters).

3. Contract amount: Malim Hun-Ba,000,000 won ( 272,690,000); and

5. The rate of liquidated damages: 0.1% per day.

6. Deadline of delivery: June 30, 2014;

B. Since then, the Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to set up the price at KRW 159,50,000 for the purpose of a contract only for the long-wavea, private shelters, and private shelters among the goods stipulated in the above contract.

(B) Before and after the amendment, the delivery period was changed to October 5, 2014. On the other hand, on October 22, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the installation of all landscaping rest facilities stipulated in the above contract to the Defendant on October 22, 2014.

【Fact-finding without dispute over the ground for recognition, entry of Gap evidence 1-1 through 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the facts above, the defendant's obligation to pay the defendant's money, barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 29,641,358 won (i.e., the plaintiff 29,641,368 won) out of the price stipulated in the contract of this case (i.e., the plaintiff 29,641,368 won, but considering the overall purport of the pleading in addition to the statement in Eul evidence No. 8, it appears to be a clerical error

B. The gist of the Defendant’s defense and judgment (1) ① The Defendant’s defense and judgment (1) deducts KRW 8,661,818 out of the price of the goods as the ordering agent from the liquidated damages for delay on the wind that the Plaintiff delays the delivery date stipulated in the instant contract. As such, the unpaid amount should be deducted from the price.

② Also, the Defendant is separate from the Plaintiff.