A. The status of the party is the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) as a corporation aimed at maintaining the automobile, etc.

The representative director C, D, and E of the plaintiff and the defendant are in both marital relations.

C and E are punishment relationships.

F and G are the former representative director of the Plaintiff.

B. On March 15, 1994, E is leased a building of J 1,515 square meters and its ground from I on March 15, 1994 and “H Motor Vehicle Maintenance Industry Operator” (hereinafter “instant Maintenance Business Operator”).

(2) On June 8, 2001, L used the automobile maintenance business from around 1994 to around 2001, and C used the automobile maintenance business at the instant maintenance facility. E entered into a contract for the transfer and acquisition of a place of business (facilities, other machinery, etc.) with K and L (representative of his employees), one of its creditors, on May 16, 2001, on the part of the operation of the instant maintenance facility, E entered into a contract for the transfer and acquisition of the instant maintenance facility to the said creditors. 2) L reported the operation of the instant maintenance facility by registering its business from June 8, 2001 in the gold Business Book, and E reported the closure of business as the next day.

C and M (C’s wife D’s wife) were provided as security for transfer the corporeal movables of the instant maintenance office in order to guarantee retirement and payment from L on April 28, 2004.

L made a report on the closure of the instant maintenance office as of December 15, 2004 in the gold business book.

C acquired part of the corporeal movables of the instant maintenance office in a compulsory execution procedure based on the above transfer security, and acquired the remaining corporeal movables by paying a price to a third party who purchased them in the auction procedure.

3) On March 13, 2014, E filed a lawsuit against C and D seeking delivery of movable property and return of unjust enrichment by asserting ownership of the corporeal movables of the instant C and D, but the Busan District Court was justified by C and D on October 31, 2014.