A. Defendant B: the real estate listed in Section 1 of [Attachment];

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

(a)the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and each of the changed reasons for the claim;

(b) Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

2. Each claim against Defendant B, D, F, G, E, H, I, J, K, and L

A. Basic facts 1) The Plaintiff is deemed to be the Plaintiff’s housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) with the area of project implementation of 102,769m2, Seo-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon as its project implementation district.

(2) On February 9, 2018, the head of Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City approved the Plaintiff’s management and disposition plan and announced it on the same day.

(3) Defendant B, D, and F are the owners of each real estate listed in paragraphs (1) and (3) through (5) of the attached list in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district. Defendant E, H, I, J, K, and L are co-owners who own the real estate listed in paragraph (6) of the attached list in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district, and they are co-owners who own the real estate listed in paragraph (6) of the attached list in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district. The said Defendants were eligible for cash settlement by failing to make an announcement of the Plaintiff’s application for parcelling-out. Meanwhile, Defendant G leased the real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached list in the Plaintiff’s project implementation district and operated at the same time (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estate”).

(4) The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the Daejeon Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee, which did not reach an agreement on compensation with the said Defendants. On January 25, 2019, the said Committee set the date of commencement of expropriation as March 11, 2019 and rendered an adjudication of expropriation on each of the instant real estate, etc.

(hereinafter “instant acceptance ruling”). 3 The Plaintiff, on February 27, 2019, made Defendant B as a depositee and deposited Defendant D as the principal.