beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.04.09 2013나5662

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal (including any selective appeal added at the trial) is dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this part of the basic facts is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that “the Defendant does not cause any dispute regarding the matters of the Plaintiff and Cuniversity (Paragraph 3),” and that “ Both parties shall liquidate or terminate civil and criminal disputes with respect to each other (Paragraph 5)” had the obligation to implement the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 5 as they are, after receiving the decision of compulsory adjustment of the instant case.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated its obligations as follows.

In other words, the complaint was maintained without withdrawal of the complaint against F, G, H, etc., one of the faculty members of the C College.

② Along with the underlying operation of the V or operation of the V, the J and K were accused, and the prosecution received a decision of non-guilty by the prosecution, and actively stated that J and K committed misconduct in the investigation by a witness.

③ The text message was sent to several faculty members of the C College to cause disputes in the C College.

④ In contact with the reporters of online newspaper “L”, the act of spreading the said dispute by continuously reporting the dispute within C University, and (5) the Ministry of Education, the Board of Audit and Inspection, the Board of Audit and Inspection, and the Board of Audit and Inspection, and the Board of Education requested the Plaintiff to submit materials to the Plaintiff, directly or indirectly, after the instant decision on compulsory adjustment.

6) The Plaintiff’s representative’s bullying caused a dispute on the matters of the Plaintiff and Cuniversity (violation of the foregoing paragraph 3) and maintained a civil or criminal dispute.

(Violation of Paragraph (5) above). The defendant is believed to believe that the plaintiff will perform the compulsory mediation decision of this case.