If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 13, 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 19,50,000 as security for the said vehicle from the complainant in order to operate the franchise from the complainant (B) in Yangju-si, Nam-si, 285-109 located in New Zealand, Nam-do, 285-109, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 795,046 on September 13, 2012 to September 15, 2015.

However, the fact is only a method of deceiving the complainant to purchase an unsold apartment with the above vehicle security loan deposit, and there was no intention or ability to operate the vehicle or to repay the loan.

Nevertheless, the defendant was obtained from the complainants with a gold of KRW 19,500,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A petition for accusation (including materials attached thereto);

1. Application of a copy of a sales contract for used cars;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;