However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from around 18:10 on May 5, 2017 to around 18:40 on the same day, from 18:0 on May 5, 2017, at the beauty art room operated by the victim C (V, 39 years of age) in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, where there are other customers, would be “Chewing” to the victim on several occasions, and there is a large amount of horses if there is any change in the female, and

Chewing year h. Domination with a large sound, etc., which led to other customers who were in the cosmetic room by smoking the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant openly insulting the victim, and thereby interfered with the cosmetic business of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Articles 314 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation is that the Defendant committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol even though he had the record of being punished for the same kind of crime, the Defendant did not recover damage, did not receive a letter from the injured party, on the other hand, when the Defendant was committing the instant crime, and other circumstances shown in the argument of the instant case.