If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant, for the purpose of having the E-company E's smallest office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was punished by C, and on March 18, 2009, there are four defendants, building engineers, management department, and complainants (defendants). The defendant's smallest and construction engineer should leave outside, prevent the management department from leaving outside, place them for three hours, and place them under confinement and tax adjustment for three hours, and the defendant did not receive KRW 1.6 billion in total construction cost of E E construction cost in Gangdong-gu store lease D, which is KRW 50 million, and KRW 50 million, KRW 80,000,000,000 and KRW 50,000,000,000,000 won, and the complainant was forced to use it only for taxation, and the complainant was 50,000,000,000,000 won, and 50,000,000,000,000.

On November 20, 2014, the prosecutor's office of the Seoul East-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government's local public service center submitted the above written complaint to the person in charge of the name in the name in order to prepare a written complaint with the contents of the complaint.

However, the defendant around March 18, 2009, at the E-company office of the operation of C in the five floors of the D Building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, she shall be usheshes. "Written confirmation, daily gold, and the above amount shall be somewhat postponed due to one's own circumstances during the reorganization of E- company.

Provided, That on March 18, 2009, a document of borrowing KRW 50 million was written as C Chairperson and A on March 18, 2009, and was written as Bushes, and was written as C’s employees, with the word “a document of borrowing KRW 50 million is null and void,” and was written as B’s employees.

As such, even though the Defendant deleted the part of “a loan certificate of KRW 50 million” in the above written confirmation, C filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking payment of KRW 50 million, and such written confirmation was deemed to have no liability on the ground that “a loan certificate of KRW 50 million is null and void.”