전자금융거래법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall transfer a means of access for electronic financial transactions.
On December 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the college student conference room located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul; (b) obtained a proposal from E, the student conference Chairperson, and accepted the proposal, and (c) obtained a passbook, physical card,OTP device, and password that is linked to the National Bank Account (F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day; and (d) obtained a passbook, physical card, OTP device, and password that is linked to the six accounts in the name of the Defendant from October 31, 2014 to October 31, 2014 in the same manner as the following crime list:
Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access for electronic financial transactions.
- Crime List No. - On December 4, 2013, the means of access to the receipt price of the temporary account (the name of the defendant) - The summary of the evidence transferred to the current National Bank G Glydong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong H on February 18, 2014 on April 28, 2014 at the same time on July 31, 2014, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong I on April 28, 2014 at the same time on July 31, 2014.
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report of internal investigation, details of transactions in each account, application of Acts and subordinate statutes in indictment of year 2015 and 5906 to the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office;
1. Article 49(4)1 and Article 6(3)1 of the former Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts (Amended by Act No. 13069, Jan. 20, 2015)
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. The Defendant’s crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in the workhouse is for electronic financial transactions.