손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, each of the plaintiffs' KRW 224,030,892 against the defendant and KRW 100,000,50 among them shall be applied.
1. The reasons for this part of the facts are as follows: (a) the court’s reasoning is that the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment, except where the court finds “nive living facilities” as “nive living facilities” (hereinafter “Gu building”) of the judgment of the first instance as “nive living facilities” of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. The reasoning for this part of the claim by the parties is as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article
An appraiser at the last 4th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be appointed as an appraiser at the first instance.
The following shall be added to five pages of the judgment of the first instance.
In addition, in view of the fact that the Defendant’s liability for damages is much more than the period of possession of the land in this case, the Plaintiffs could have sufficiently known from the time of construction of the old building the overall reclamation status of the instant wastes on the land in this case, and that if the Plaintiffs were to properly investigate and verify buried wastes at the time of first discovery of wastes in 198, or to conduct an investigation, verification, and disposal by notifying the Defendant who is the seller of the land, the size of the damage would have significantly decreased, even if the Defendant’s liability for damages was recognized, a large amount of comparative negligence should be recognized when considering the Plaintiffs’ negligence in relation to the expansion of damage.
A person shall be appointed.
3. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment regarding the relevant legal principles and the plaintiffs' claims is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following reasons.
On the 6th of the first instance judgment, "the result of the appraiser's appraisal by the appraiser R, the result of the fact-finding inquiry and reply to the appraiser by this court" is "the result of the appraiser's appraisal by the first instance court and the first instance court."