However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 11, 2016, at around 04:49, the Defendant heard the horses that “C” in front of the convenience store located in the Busan Coast Guard B, and that the taxi passengers would not take a bath from E by the police box belonging to the Busan Coast Guard Police Station, which was called after receiving a report of 112 that the taxi passengers scam, and sent out after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant threatened E with “Y, scam, scam, age, scam, scam, and scam,” and humbling the body of E on the breast.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement statute to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the nature of the crime of this case is poor, that the defendant can be convicted of violence including the same crime, that the defendant has not been convicted of a fine exceeding the fine since 1994, that the defendant has not been convicted of a violation, that is, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc.