재물손괴등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
On February 13, 2020, the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months in the year of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras, Use and Screening of Cameras, etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court on February 13, 202, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February
Punishment of the crime
On September 11, 2019, the defendant filed a request for detention warrant due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against the Victims B (Kamerasation) and the crime of confinement and intimidation against the victim B, and sentenced the victim to contact to attend the examination date on September 1, 2019.
On September 16, 2019, the Defendant damaged the market price by putting a large phrase “Balle, Chang-micker’s death, F, and Private Capital” on the wall of the apartment corridor, namely, a residence of the victim B and his/her female, and the victim C, who is his/her mother, using the color frame as soon as possible.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. Domestic History Reports - Cctv observation
1. On-site photographing photographs, etc.;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (verification during trial period), indictments (of the Government District Prosecutors' Offices 19 type 47823), case search and reference materials by the Supreme Court Na ( of the Government District Court 2019No3902, 2019No3199) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;
1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) was that the Defendant requested a detention warrant to appear on the date of examination due to the crime committed before and after the judgment of the court below against B, and committed the instant crime.
In light of the motive, circumstance, and method of the above crime, and the relationship with victims, etc., the crime is not good.
(b).