However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-to-burd vehicle with alcohol concentration of approximately 0.170% from the 2km section from the parking lot for the main apartment commercial building in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, to the same tamping 27 knin-ro Dom 27.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report on the circumstances of drivers;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In full view of the circumstances following the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, the same sentence as the order shall be determined.

- There is a record of being punished several times for the same crime, provided that the driving of the drinking of this case does not cause other traffic accidents due to the driving of the drinking of this case. - there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine. - The defendant is against his own mistake.