However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) found the victim on the ground that he was protruding the urine from the D toilets managed by the victim C in Gwangju Mine-gu around 20:30 on June 25, 2017 on the ground that he was protruding the urine.

Ga. Does, this son, who talks with the same kind of franchis, shall be h.h., h.h., f.h., f.h., f.h., f.h., f.h., f.h., the f.

The purpose of “the victim’s bath was to read, and thereby interfered with the victim’s duty of care by force, such as displaying the victim’s drinking.”

2. On June 25, 2017, at around 20:47, the Defendant: (a) reported that he had a junator before the foregoing D and sent out after receiving 112 report; (b) whether the position F for the situation belonging to the police station E District of Gwangju Mine Police Station would have to return home to the Defendant; and (c) whether the Defendant was called out with him with such an intention to return home.

He was young young children and tried to see to the effect that “I am young children. I am sexual,” and tried to see the F F’s outer blicks by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the execution of duties concerning the 112 reported case handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and C;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of punishment under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, is limited to the crimes committed in six months to two years [the scope of the recommended punishment] under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, on the grounds that there is no person subject to special sentencing [the scope of the punishment] under Article 2 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, where there is no person subject to special sentencing [the scope of the punishment] under Article 62(2) [the scope of the punishment] under Article 62(1) [the scope of the punishment under Article 62(1) [the scope of the punishment under Article 62(1)]; Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties