However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving a sports cargo vehicle.

On November 17, 2016, the defendant driving the above cargo vehicle around 18:15, and driving the above cargo vehicle on the road of "E" in "E" in "Y" in Scheon-si, and driving on the road of "E" at approximately 50 km speed from the Pocheon-si to the flood control area of the water source.

Since there is a road with no signal apparatus, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk by reducing the speed for the driver of the vehicle and thoroughly seeing the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side of the road in the direction-hand side of the road by negligence, and received the part of the victim F (the age of 60) in front of the right side of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on November 17, 201, caused the victim’s death by blood diversous shock at the government-specific hospital of the Tol University located in 271, Gicheon-ro, Gicheon-ro, Gicheon-ro, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. A written statement of the accused involved in the traffic accident;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs and photographs related to accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a death diagnosis report, postmortem report, and examination and examination report of a dead body;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the following sentencing grounds) led to a serious consequence of the death of the victim who dried the crosswalk, due to the mistake of the defendant.

It is impossible to impose minor punishment.

However, the defendant has not been subject to any criminal punishment for the age of 71, and has lived in good faith in a difficult environment.

(e).