약정금
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following reasons: (a) although the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 14 through 31 (including paper numbers) additionally presented in the court of first instance is not sufficient to find the facts of the court of first instance or to recognize the facts alleged by the plaintiffs (including the assertion that the plaintiffs entered into an settlement agreement with the defendant, which is added in the court of first instance, with the agreement to the investment contract of this case with the defendant around March, 2014 and received KRW 80 million of each dividend from the defendant as agreed upon with the defendant).
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.