However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 7. 9. 10:18 경 목포시 영산로 98에 있는 목포 역 대합실 내에서, 술에 취해 갑자기 화가 난다는 이유로 그 곳에 설치된 여객 대기용 의자 1개를 양손으로 들어 올린 후 바닥에 내리쳐 피해자 코 레일 네트 웍스 소유의 위 의자를 수리 비 약 74,800원 상당이 들도록 부수어 이를 손괴하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A photograph of the suspect CCTV course;

1. Photographs of damaged passengers for waiting;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. A sentence under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (The following favorable circumstances): The sentence shall be imposed in accordance with the order, taking into account all the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the above conditions and the defendant’s age, sex, career, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., by taking into account: (a) the fact that the punishment was imposed several times for the same kind of crime; (b) the fact that the person has not been indemnified for the damage; (c) the fact that the damage is relatively minor; and (d) the damage appears to be a relatively minor.