손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the selector B are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
purport, purport, and.
1. The court's explanation concerning this case is based on the third-party decision of the first instance court.
Paragraph (2)(c) of Paragraph (2) is used as follows, and the following Paragraph (3) is added to Part 7 of the first instance judgment, and each entry in Category 7, 20 (including paper numbers) is the same as the entry in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition of each entry in Category 7, 20 (including paper numbers) as evidence of a lack of not more than 10 in the 9th sentence of the first instance judgment. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part “(C) imported from the trial room for the trial held that the Plaintiff was unable to be employed as a dentist due to shock arising from joint tort committed by the Defendant (Appointed Party) C and the Selection B, and thus, the Plaintiff shall compensate for damages equivalent to the lost income. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion alone is insufficient to deem that the Plaintiff was in a situation in which the Plaintiff was unable to engage in labor, such as the Plaintiff’s failure to work as a dentist due to the instant tort committed by the Appointed B, and it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff received consolation money from the Appointed to the closure of the instant dental work as follows. Thus, it is difficult to view that there was a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s tort committed in this case from the date of the Plaintiff’s last payment of wages to the date of the closure of the instant dental work, and the Plaintiff’s damages equivalent to the lost income accrued after the closure of the instant dental work, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion in this part is rejected.
3. The part added in the trial was caused by the tort of this case committed by the selected party B in light of the details and result of the case where the Plaintiff concluded and processed the delegation contract with the law firm Samyangyang and the law firm.