2. Although the Defendant made a confession and reflects on the judgment, and partly defrauded money was given, the Defendant had the history of punishment several times due to the same criminal conduct and the scambling, and the Defendant committed each of the instant fraud during the repeated crime period due to fraud, and the restoration of damage was not fully carried out, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the " August 23, 2014" in Part 1 of the third part of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to " August 29, 2014" ex officio.