In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

1. On November 26, 2015, the Defendants who interfered with their duties were able to take a bath on the ground that Defendant A’s wife did not walk the way for the victim’s wife to walk. Defendant B her cell phone “SPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the operation of the said cafeteria by the victim.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties were asked from police officers E and F who were called out after receiving 112 reports at the above time and time, and asked them only to commit the act of interference with duties. The Defendants pushed the police officers on several occasions, thereby pushing the police officers on their body, and Defendant A took one time by drinking the police officers E’s right blick part, and Defendant B, the police officers attempted to arrest Defendant A as a current criminal interfering with the performance of official duties, leading the police officers E’s arms, and pushed the police officers’ blicks, pl up, etc., and assaulted the police officers’ hand f.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the 112 reported duties by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 314(1), 30 (Interference with Business), and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, as well as the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the order of provisional payment.