However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 18, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on July 18, 2008. On September 16, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On November 11, 2014, at around 21:49, the Defendant driven a B-hurged vehicle with a blood alcohol content of about 0.149% under the influence of alcohol at approximately one kilometer from the front road of the Seocho-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu to the front road of the Seocho-gu, Gyeongnam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, to the front road of the Cheongnam-gu, Gyeongnam-dong, Gyeongnam-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Report on the results of the drinking control, and the statement of the status of the drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, each summary order, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Ministry of Probation, Order to attend a lecture, or Order to attend a community service order has reached the instant crime, despite the records of the same crime. However, it is so decided as per Disposition by taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s reflection, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and environment,